Muslims Are “Islamatards” and “Islamo-Commies,” and Non-Christian Immigrants Are “Sand in the Sugar Bowl”

As one insightful soul on Twitter put it, ‘Europe will be destroyed by women who project onto those animals the motherhood that belonged to the children they aborted.’ But as Michael Knowles pointed out, there is a problem with the popular takeaway that Muslim immigrants are rioting and causing all this mayhem. The reality is a bit more complicated than that. This is not to exonerate the Muslims over their involvement because they certainly joined in on what they considered to be the festivities... lighting off these periodic conflagrations is a lot more dangerous than the French way used to be because of all the Muslim fumes in the room now.

▶Watch from 1:07

If Hassan dies whimpering, it will be about 5 minutes before we are flooded with memes, some of them very funny, which exhibit exactly the problem I think somebody should be anticipating. On the other hand, if Hassan faces death with any kind of fortitude, then the whole thing may well create a martyr and saint for the Islamatards. And who around here needed that?

▶Watch from 6:30

And this is why Joe’s talk is so important, because how much sand can you put in the sugar bowl before it’s not the sugar bowl anymore, right? So you have a Christian nation with a Christian consensus, Christian history, and then in the Biden years alone, over 13 million people with different views on things are flooding the zone... We’re only having the debate because of immigration. If we had 1920 levels of the demographic in America, we wouldn’t be having this debate.

▶Watch from 2:19:53

[Aaron Zitner: “Is there room in a Christian, biblically driven society, a Christian nationalist society for Muslims and Hindus and people who aren’t Christians?”] Yes, but not room for a ton of them. Protestants, Catholics and Jews are sort of a de facto arrangement that we’ve worked out over centuries, but I wouldn’t want to exacerbate our problem by importing millions of Muslims such that we wind up with Dearborn, Michigan with unregulated immigration. You’re gonna turn the Michigan-Ohio border into the India-Pakistan border. You’re just importing strife.

▶Watch from 2:00

We need to be geared up to vote against everything commie, commie adjacent, commie simpatico, commie in denial, or coming to the point at issue, islamo commie. And when you go into the voting booth, you should be going into the booth looking like Aragorn at Helm's Deep, all done fooling around.

▶Watch from 6:01

[Pamela Brown: “How would a Muslim, or a Mormon, or even a Catholic fit into your version of a Christian nation?”] Yeah. So one of the reasons we have such problems with assimilating Muslims and all these different Hindus is that there are so many of them. Right? So if we had a Christian republic and a Muslim came to Disneyland with his family, we have no problem. But when they fill up Dearborn, Michigan, that’s just not… It says in Amos 3:3, “Can two walk together, except they be agreed?” You cannot put alien worldviews together cheek by jowl and have peace… So basically, I think a lot of the religious turmoil that we have, the clashes that we would have, could be addressed by a sane immigration policy, not a policy that tries to regulate what people can say or do in their religious convictions.

▶Watch from 5:31

But, the Crusades, the initial Crusades were inspired by centuries of Muslim aggression and attacks on Europe. And the kind of Muslim invasion that's going on in Europe is an inspiration to bloodshed at a level of 10 100X as opposed to a conference title that uses warfare as a metaphor. So, the actual issue is uncontrolled borders... You can't import the third world without becoming the third world. And you can't—if you brought in a million Muslims and a million Hindus and put them on each side of the—you have just introduced India and Pakistan. All right? You've not westernized anything. You've made everything worse.

▶Watch from 24:37